

|
Browse Profiles > Ghana > Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision |
| Score | Rank | |
| Standards Compliance Index | 25.00 out of 100 | 60 |
| Business Indicator Index | 7.40 out of 12 | 48 |
Ghana|
Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) in its 2003 Financial Sector Stability Assessment (FSSA) Update mentions the results of a 2000-2001 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) for Ghana, which was not published. The 2003 FSSA Update indicated that Ghana had a high degree of compliance with the Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision. Nonetheless, the report also pointed to several significant shortcomings, particularly in the legal framework. These include the lack of operational independence of the banking sector supervisor, the Bank of Ghana (BoG); political interference from the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning; inadequate information sharing among supervisors; weak supervision of foreign branches of domestic banks; the absence of anti-money laundering legislation; and the lack of rules on consolidated supervision. According to the 2003 FSSA the passage of the Banking Act would rectify most of the shortcomings pertaining to the legal framework. This bill was passed in 2004 as Banking Act No. 673. The IMF's 2007 Article IV Consultation report on Ghana notes that the regulatory environment in Ghana for banking supervision is largely adequate and the banking sector is well-capitalized, liquid, profitable, and meets international capital adequacy standards. The report also mentions that a BoG self-assessment indicated that Ghana has incorporated the IMF's FSAP recommendations. General Overview The International Monetary Fund (IMF) in its 2003 Financial Sector Stability Assessment (FSSA) Update mentions the results of a 2000-2001 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) for Ghana, which was not published. The 2003 FSSA Update found that Ghana "exhibited a high degree of compliance with the [Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision], but noted significant shortcomings in several areas" (p. 24). These included the lack of operational independence of the banking sector supervisor, the Bank of Ghana (BoG); political interference from the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning; inadequate information sharing among supervisors; weak supervision of foreign branches of domestic banks; absence of anti-money laundering legislation; and the lack of rules on consolidated supervision. However, the FSSA Update, noted that the passage of the 2003 Banking bill (now the Banking Act of 2004) would strengthen the legal framework for banking supervision; enhance the operational independence of the BoG; introduce consolidated supervision; and enable information sharing with other regulators. This bill was passed in 2004 as Banking Act No. 673.The Principles
The 2003 IMF FSSA Update on Ghana observed that a 2003 Banking Bill, if passed by Parliament, would enhance central bank responsibilities and have clear rules and procedures for banking supervision. The bill was subsequently passed as the Banking Act No. 673 of 2004. However, there is little information publicly available regarding the effectiveness of this Banking Act subsequent to the 2003 FSSA Update.
The 2005 IMF report observes that one of the principal recommendations of the 2003 FSSA was to reinforce BoG independence, adding that Ghana has successfully implemented that recommendation with the passage of the 2004 Banking Act. The 2003 IMF report on Selected Issues in Ghana indicated that the passage of the Banking Act would enhance the BoG's independence, operational efficiency, and supervisory powers. The report further mentions that the Act would reduce political interference and involvement in the banking system, ensure greater transparency in the regulatory framework for banking, and enhance the BoG's operational autonomy so that it could act more assertively in enforcing prudential regulations. The bill was passed in 2004 as Banking Act No. 673.
A 2003 IMF report on Selected Issues in Ghana mentions that a draft Banking Act, if passed by Parliament, would bolster the banking supervision provisions of the 2001 Bank of Ghana Act by clarifying the rules and procedures. The bill was subsequently passed as the Banking Act No. 673 of 2004. According to the 2006 BoG Annual Report, the BoG has introduced a new licensing policy to ensure a sound and well-capitalized financial system. Under this policy, the BoG allows only "well established foreign banks" to enter the Ghanaian banking system (p. 30). However, there is insufficient information publicly available regarding Ghana's compliance with this Principle.
There is insufficient information publicly available regarding Ghana's compliance with this Principle. However, according to a 2003 IMF report on Selected Issues in Ghana, a draft Banking Act, if passed by Parliament, would bolster the banking supervision provisions of the 2001 Bank of Ghana Act and shift the authority to change the capital adequacy ratio (CAR) for banks from the Minister of Finance and Economic Planning to the BoG. The bill was subsequently passed as the Banking Act No. 673 of 2004.
There is insufficient information publicly available addressing Ghana's compliance with this principle.
The 2003 IMF FSSA Update on Ghana notes that a draft Banking Act, if passed by Parliament, would grant the BoG the power to cooperate for purposes of information sharing with other relevant financial supervisors, including the National Insurance Commission. The bill was subsequently passed as the Banking Act No. 673 of 2004. However, there is insufficient information publicly available addressing Ghana's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient information publicly available addressing Ghana's compliance with this principle. However, a 2003 IMF report on Selected Issues in Ghana mentions that a draft Banking Act, if passed by Parliament, would shift powers to grant licenses from the Minister of Finance and Economic Planning to the BoG and lay down stricter licensing requirements. The bill was subsequently passed as the Banking Act No. 673 of 2004. According to the 2006 BoG Annual Report, it has introduced a new licensing policy to ensure a sound and well-capitalized financial system. Under this policy, the BoG allows only "well established foreign banks" to enter the Ghanaian banking system (p. 30). In spite of the above information, there is little information publicly available addressing Ghana's compliance with this Principle
According to the 2006 BoG Annual Report, it has introduced a new licensing policy to ensure a sound and well-capitalized financial system. According to the same report, under this policy, the BoG allows only "well established foreign banks" (p. 30) to enter the Ghanaian banking system. Apart from this, there is insufficient information publicly available regarding Ghana's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient information publicly available as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient information publicly available addressing Ghana's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient information publicly available directly addressing Ghana's compliance with this principle. However, The 2007 IMF Article IV report and the 2007 IMF report on Selected Issues in Ghana both state that as of 2006, Ghanaian banks are generally well capitalized and meet minimum capital requirement of 10 percent set in 2006, and most surpass it with an average CAR of 17 percent. The 2006 BoG Annual Report also attests that all banks under its supervision had the minimum capital of Ghanaian Cedi (GHC) 70 billion (amounting to a capital adequacy ratio of 10 percent) required by the BoG for universal banking business by December 31, 2006. The 2003 IMF FSSA Update on Ghana noted that a draft Banking Act, if passed by Parliament, would give the BoG the authority to define capital adequacy requirements for banks. The bill was subsequently passed as the Banking Act No. 673 of 2004. The 2003 FSSA Update observed however, that many local Ghanaian banks and other financial institutions were allowed to operate without meeting CARs set by the BoG.
The 2003 IMF FSSA Update on Ghana notes that a draft banking Act, if passed by Parliament, would enable the BoG to issue internationally aligned loan classification and provisioning requirements. The bill was subsequently passed as the Banking Act No. 673 of 2004. However, there is insufficient information publicly available regarding Ghana's compliance with this principle.
The 2007 Article IV Consultation report by the IMF appears satisfied at the quality of assets and the low levels of nonperforming loans of Ghanaian banks and also finds that loan provisioning is adequate. The report also found a declining trend in nonperforming loans, with the ratio declining to 7.5 percent of total loans due to growth in loan assets as well as loan recovery. The 2003 IMF FSSA Update on Ghana had noted that a draft Banking Act, if passed by Parliament, would enable the BoG to issue internationally aligned loan classification and provisioning requirements. The bill was subsequently passed as the Banking Act No. 673 of 2004. However, there little further information publicly available as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
A 2007 IMF report attests that Ghana has taken substantial steps to enhance its management information system with the passing of the Credit Reporting Law, which set up a reporting bureau, to be operational before end 2007, and to which all banks must submit credit details of their customers. The report observes that this will potentially enhance information flow, bring transparency and reduce lending risks. The exposure of a systemically important bank to the Tema Oil Refinery has also been reduced by securitization of the loan by the government in 2001-2002 and by a planned divestiture of the refinery. However, there is insufficient information publicly available as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient information publicly available as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient information publicly available on Ghana's compliance with this principle.
The 2003 IMF FSSA Update on Ghana recommended that Ghana enhance the BoG's power and capacity to monitor market risk exposure of the banks it supervised. However, there is insufficient information publicly available as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
The IMF's 2007 Article IV Consultation report notes that Ghana intends to move towards a risk-based supervisory framework more in line with the Basel II approach. The BoG also intends to encourage banks to strengthen their risk management practices. Another 2007 IMF report discloses that Ghana has taken substantial steps to enhance its risk management processes and has applied the recommendations of the 2003 FSSA Update to contain the major risks of its banking sector. The BoG states in its 2006 Annual Report that it has introduced its framework for risk-based supervision "as a precursor to the full implementation of the Basel II Accord" (p. 30). The BoG will also require banks under its supervision to enhance their risk management systems and functions so as to ensure their safety and soundness. The 2007 IMF report also finds that, in 2006, the minimum capital requirement for banks was increased and met by all banks, thereby building a safeguard against asset quality deterioration. Further, Ghana passed the Credit Reporting Law, which set up a reporting bureau that will be operational before end 2007. At that time, all banks must submit credit details of their customers to the bureau. This will potentially enhance information flow, bring transparency, and reduce lending risks. The exposure of a systemically important bank to the Tema Oil Refinery has also been reduced by securitization of the loan by the government in 2001-2002 and by a planned divestiture of the refinery. Apart from this, there is insufficient information publicly available as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient information publicly available addressing Ghana's compliance with this principle.
The 2005 U.S. DoS report notes that, as of August 2005, the BoG was finalizing a draft law on money laundering. However, it also observed that the banking sector still lacked a strong regulatory framework against money laundering and other suspicious transactions. The BoG website also indicates that Ghana does not have a comprehensive anti-money laundering law as of 2007.
The IMF's 2003 FSSA Update noted that the BoG had taken substantial steps to modernize its on-site and off-site supervisory processes through capacity building, computerized auditing procedures, stricter licensing procedures, and more streamlined on-site inspection reports. However, there is insufficient information publicly available as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information on Ghana's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
The 2003 IMF FSSA Update on Ghana commended the BoG on its progress in modernizing its onsite and offsite supervisory procedures. However, there is little publicly available information as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
According to the 2003 IMF FSSA Update on Ghana, a draft Banking Act, if passed by Parliament, would grant the BoG the ability to supervise banking groups on a consolidated basis. The bill was subsequently passed as the Banking Act No. 673 of 2004. However, there is little publicly available information as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
According to the IAS Plus website maintained by Deloitte & Touche Tohmatsu, Ghana adopted the International Financial Reporting Standards on January 1, 2007, thereby replacing the local Ghana National Accounting Standards. IFRSs became applicable for all listed companies and banks. Besides this report, there is little information publicly available addressing Ghana's compliance with this principle.
The IMF's 2005 Article IV report on Ghana mentions the 2000-01 FSAP recommendation to the BoG to create a system of reviewing risk-management procedures of banks under its supervision and take appropriate corrective actions, as needed. In this regard, the 2005 report informs that per the FSAP recommendation, BoG reviewed the risk management approaches taken by banks and as a result liquidated three banks in 2000. Also, BoG's enforcement powers were further enhanced by the passing of the Banking Act in 2004. However, there is insufficient information publicly available as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient publicly available information as to Ghana's compliance with this principle.
There is insufficient information publicly available regarding Ghana's compliance with this principle.
The 2003 IMF FSSA Update on Ghana finds that a draft Banking Act, if passed by Parliament, would give the BoG the power to cooperate for purposes of information sharing with home country banking supervisors of foreign-owned banks operating in Ghana to achieve consolidated supervision of these banks on a global basis. The bill was subsequently passed as the Banking Act No. 673 of 2004. However, there is little further information publicly available as to Ghana's compliance with this principle. |
Jump to other standards Sources of Assessment International Monetary Fund, "Ghana: Selected Issues," Country Report No. 03/134, Washington, D.C.: IMF, May 2003. Available from International Monetary Fund. Accessed on October 24, 2007. (IMF 2003a) International Monetary Fund, "Ghana: Financial System Stability Assessment Update, including Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes on the following topics: Banking Supervision, Insurance Regulation, and Securities Regulation," Country Report No. 03/396, Washington, D.C.: IMF, December 2003. Available from International Monetary Fund website. Accessed on October 24, 2007. (IMF 2003b) International Monetary Fund, "Ghana: 2007 Article IV Consultation - Staff Report; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Ghana," Country Report No. 07/210, Washington, D.C.: IMF, June 2007. Available from International Monetary Fund website. Accessed on October 19, 2007. (IMF 2007a) International Monetary Fund, " Ghana: Selected Issues," Country Report No. 07/208, Washington, D.C.: IMF, June 2007. Available from International Monetary Fund website. Accessed on October 19, 2007. (IMF 2007b) Relevant Organizations Bank of Ghana (BoG) Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning Relevant Legislation/Regulation Banking Act No. 673, 2004 Bank of Ghana Act No. 612, 2002 Credit Reporting Act No. 729, 2007 Bank of Ghana Ordinance No. 34, 1957 Supplementary Sources Bank of Ghana, "Annual Report 2006," 2006. Available from Bank of Ghana website. Accessed on October 29, 2007. (BoG 2006) Bank of Ghana website. Accessed on October 29, 2007. (BoG website) Deloitte & Touche Tohmatsu IAS Plus website. Accessed on October 22, 2007. (Deloitte IAS Plus website) Ghana News Agency, "Parliament passes Banking Bill," Ghana Home Page, December 18, 2003. Available from Ghana Home Page website. Accessed on October 25, 2006. (GNA 2003) International Monetary Fund, "Ghana: 2005 Article IV Consultation, Third Review Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, and Request for Waiver of Nonobservance of Performance Criteria and Extension of the Arrangement - Staff Report; Staff Statement; Public Information Notice and Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Ghana," Country Report No. 05/292, Washington, D.C.: IMF, August 2005. Available from International Monetary Fund website. Accessed on October 19, 2007. (IMF 2005) PricewaterhouseCoopers, "Is the Industry on the Ball - Ghana Banking Survey 2007," 2007. Available from PricewaterhouseCoopers website. Accessed on October 22, 2007. (PwC 2007) U.S. Department of State, Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, "International Narcotics Control Strategy Report 2004," March 2005. Available from U.S. Department of State website. Accessed on October 25, 2006. (U.S. DoS 2005) |