

|
Browse Profiles > Portugal > Code of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy |
| Score | Rank | |
| Standards Compliance Index | 63.33 out of 100 | 10 |
| Business Indicator Index | 10.98 out of 12 | 3 |
Portugal|
Code of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy
The most recent International Monetary Fund (IMF) Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) to address Portugal's fiscal transparency was published in 2003. According to this report, Portugal already complies with several aspects of the transparency code and is making progress in those areas where work is still required. The IMF found that there is a clear allocation of fiscal roles and responsibilities across the various levels of government and there is greater consistency in the budget policies followed by the diverse agencies of government. Nonetheless, the 2003 report found that significant improvements were still needed, particularly with regard to more fully integrating a medium-term budget framework into the budget preparation process. Additionally, Portugal needs to improve the quality of its budget projections and fiscal risk analysis. In its 2007 Article IV Consultation report, the IMF applauds Portugal's plans to enact certain fundamental reforms to its budget process, including an expressed intention to address the medium-term budget framework issue raised in the 2003 ROSC. The 2007 report does caution, however, that the target date for these reforms, set for 2010, may be too ambitious. General Overview The International Monetary Fund's (IMF) most recent fiscal module of the Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) for Portugal was published in 2003. At that time, Portugal was found to have made significant progress in its efforts toward improving fiscal transparency. The report specifically states that "Portugal meets the requirements of the fiscal transparency code in several areas," (p. 1). The IMF based its conclusions on a number of factors, including the clearly differentiated allocation of responsibilities across government levels, stable intergovernmental fiscal relations, a complex but consistently observed legal framework governing the budget and fiscal policy and practice, and a relatively open budget process. It further noted that "adequate mechanisms of internal and external control of government operations are in place; and audited accounts of all government entities are prepared and disseminated, albeit with fairly long lags" (p. 11). Portugal is a member of the European Monetary Union (EMU). As such, it is obligated to comply with the Stability and Growth Pact.The Principles
The 2003 IMF ROSC found that Portugal meets many of the requirements of the fiscal transparency code, and progress is ongoing in this regard. According to the ROSC, "the allocation of responsibilities between different levels of government is clearly defined" (p. 1). Because it is a member of the EMU, Portugal is obliged to comply with the Stability and Growth Pact. According to the report, Portugal's fiscal management is clearly grounded in the Budget Framework Law and the Budget Stability Law, along with the annual Budget Law and annual Budget Execution Decree. Tax law is complex, as are the laws governing regulation and administrative procedures. Nonetheless, they are "generally observed in practice, and taxpayer rights are protected" (p. 11). Still, the ROSC found that the taxation system could be improved through a simplification of the legislative regime and speeding up the response time of tax authorities to taxpayer queries. The Constitution also participates in the legislative underpinnings of fiscal policy by setting forth principles of intergovernmental relationships within the fiscal process. The rights of local governments to levy taxes are embodied in the Local Finance Law, while the Azores and Madeira are assured legislative and administrative autonomy by the provisions of the Finance Law of the Autonomous Regions. The autonomous regions generate their own taxes, approve their own fiscal system, and establish their own budget. By law, the Bank of Portugal is independent and its role does not include the conduct of quasi-fiscal activities. According to the ROSC, Portugal follows the ESA95 in the way that it defines the institutions of the general government.
The 2003 IMF ROSC asserted that "Portugal meets the requirements of the fiscal transparency code in several areas and has been making significant progress in strengthening fiscal management and transparency" (p. 1). The fiscal responsibilities falling to the various levels of government are clearly defined. Tax law, regulation, and administration, although complex, are "generally observed in practice" (p. 11). Most specifically, "the budget process is based on a clear legal framework and [is] relatively open" (p. 11). The ROSC particularly noted that new legislation had been recently enacted that was expected to significantly improve the transparency of budget execution. The new legislation provided for stronger reporting requirements across the board in the general government.
According to the 2003 IMF ROSC, "Portugal meets the requirements of the fiscal transparency code in several areas and has been making significant progress in strengthening fiscal management and transparency" (p. 1). Cash-based data on budget execution are published monthly. These data provide coverage of the central government and the social security administration, and can be accessed on the website maintained by the General Directorate for the Budget. In 2003 Portugal began publishing quarterly accounts of some of the local authorities. The final accounts of the general government are published by the National Statistics Institute (INE) after a two-year lag and can be accessed on the INE’s website. The ROSC reported that the Ministry of Finance and Public Administration's failure to closely monitor SOE activities and its only recent assumption of oversight over public-private partnerships has resulted in only limited information being available regarding the state's contingent liabilities. State debt data is published monthly, and the ROSC found these data to be both accurate and timely. The ROSC further noted that "formal commitments for timely publication of a broader coverage of fiscal data have been made" (p. 15). Some elements of general government data are done according to a cash basis, and these are available "with minimal delay" (p. 21). Accrual-based final fiscal data reporting, however, is subject to as much as a two-year lag, even though this lag time is required by the Budget Framework Law to be significantly reduced, to six months. The ROSC also mentioned a new reporting system created by the Ministry of Finance and Public Administration that would solicit quarterly local government data as to their ability to comply with debt limits set by the annual budget law.
The IMF's 2003 fiscal ROSC reported that, with regard to fiscal management and transparency, Portugal has made significant progress in recent years. In particular, the report cited the existence of "adequate mechanisms of internal and external control of government operations" and added that "audited accounts of all government entities are prepared and disseminated" (p. 11). Because of Portugal's membership in the European Monetary Union, the ROSC notes that "Portugal's fiscal policy must conform to the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact" (p. 11). According to the report, budget documentation includes a presentation of the principle assumptions made with regard to the external environment, as well as analysis of recent events and projections for principle macroeconomic aggregates. The ROSC further noted that when actual GDP growth falls short of macroeconomic projections, the reconciliation of actual revenues to projections is accomplished by cutting investment spending. This means that the composition of actual spending will at times differ significantly from the spending set forth in the initial budget. There is a disparity in the accounting frameworks used across the various levels of government, a situation which has led to reporting delays and the need for numerous revisions in the fiscal data. The central government's reliance on cash accounting makes it difficult to achieve proper monitoring and control of payments in a timely manner. At the time of the ROSC, Portugal was also in the midst of a dispute with EUROSTAT as to the proper methodology for dealing with statistics on capital injections into SOEs that are operating at a loss. An annual external audit is carried out by the legally independent Court of Auditors. This report, along with recommendations, is submitted to the National Assembly for review. The ROSC cautioned, however, that there was only limited corrective action taken when deficiencies were identified. |
Jump to other standards Sources of Assessment International Monetary Fund, "Portugal: Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes – Fiscal Transparency Module," Country Report No. 03/373, Washington, D.C.: IMF, November 2003. Available from International Monetary Fund website. Accessed on October 13, 2008. (IMF 2003) International Monetary Fund's Special Data Dissemination Standards website. Accessed on October 13, 2008. (IMF SDDS website) Relevant Organizations Court of Auditors – Tribunal de Contas (TC) General Directorate for the Budget – Direcção-Geral do Orçamento (DGO) Ministry of Finance and Public Administration - Ministério das Finanças e da Administração Pública (MFAP) National Statistics Institute – Instituto Nacional de Estatistica (INE) Relevant Legislation/Regulation Local Finance Law No. 39, 1998 Finance Law of the Autonomous Regions Privatization Framework Law, 1990 Delimitation of Economic Sectors Decree Law, No. 86, 2003. Budget Framework Law, 2001 Budget Stability Law, 2002 The Stability and Growth Pact - Relevant legal texts Supplementary Sources International Monetary Fund, " Portugal: 2005 Article IV Consultation--Staff Report; Staff Statement; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Portugal," Country Report No. 05/375, Washington, D.C.: October 2005. Available from International Monetary Fund website. Accessed on October 16, 2008. (IMF 2005) International Monetary Fund, "Portugal: 2007 Article IV Consultation—Staff Report; Staff Statement; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by Executive Director for Portugal," Country Report No. 07/341, Washington, D.C.: IMF, October 2007. Available from International Monetary Fund website. Accessed on October 12, 2008. (IMF 2007) |