

|
Browse Profiles > Portugal > Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems |
| Score | Rank | |
| Standards Compliance Index | 63.33 out of 100 | 10 |
| Business Indicator Index | 10.98 out of 12 | 3 |
Portugal|
Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems
The Bank of Portugal (BdP) in two of its recent (2007 and 2008) reports on payment systems mentioned that the Portuguese Large-Value Real-Time Gross Settlement System (SPGT) settled all transactions with a value greater than 100,000 euro so as to minimize systemic risk. The retail payment system in Portugal, the Interbank Clearing System, according to a 2005 European Central Bank (ECB) assessment is a prominently important retail payment system rather than a systemically important payment system. In its 2004 assessment of TARGET components, the ECB concluded that SPGT fully observed seven of the ten Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems (CPSIPS) as defined by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (CPSS). It broadly observed Principles VII & VIII and Principle V was not applicable to the system. However, on February 18, 2008, SPGT was replaced by the European Union's Trans-European Automated Real-Time Gross Settlement Express Transfer (TARGET) 2 system. TARGET2 is the successor to TARGET, to which SPGT was already linked. While with TARGET, the large value interbank payment systems of member countries were interlinked, TARGET2 provides harmonized payment services under a single shared platform across its member countries. However, there is little information assessing TARGET2’s compliance with the CPSIPS except for a statement in a 2008 ECB report on TARGET2, in which it indicates that the system is expected to fully observe all the CPSIPS. Despite the lack of information on TARGET2, it is generally believed that the system is an improvement over its predecessor and its component systems. Therefore, the level of compliance assigned to SPGT by the 2004 ECB assessment is maintained until TARGET2 is fully implemented in all its member countries and assessed against the CPSIPS, which according to the 2008 ECB report, is expected in late 2008. General Overview In its 2004 assessment of TARGET components, the European Central Bank (ECB) concluded that the Portuguese Large-value Real-time Gross Settlement System (SPGT) fully observed seven of the ten Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems (CPSIPS) as defined by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (CPSS). It broadly observed Principles VII & VIII, and Principle V was not applicable to SPGT as it is a real time gross settlement (RTGS) system. According to a 2007 and a 2008 report by the Bank of Portugal (BdP) regarding the payment systems in the country, all large value transactions (greater than €100,000) were to be settled via the SPGT so as to avoid any systemic risk in the country's payment system. A 2006 report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) notes that the Portuguese payment and settlement system infrastructure "is highly developed, efficient, technologically advanced" (p. 23) and risk management of the system is effective. The report further notes that there is a sound legal basis in the country for clearing and settlement "with a clear definition of finality and irrevocability, recognition of netting and novation, and protection of collateral arrangements. No-zero-hour rule exists and transactions settled with finality cannot be unwound, not even in case of a bankruptcy. The infrastructure for payments ensures a high degree of security and operational reliability" (p. 23).The Principles
The 2004 ECB assessment concluded that SPGT observed this principle. However, in February 2008, TARGET2 replaced SPGT and as of October 2008, there is no published assessment of TARGET2 against the CPSS' CPSIPS. According to the ECB's 2007 annual report, in 2007, the Eurosystem completed the TARGET2 Guideline, which forms the basis for the NCBs to establish their TARGET2 component systems, governed by their national legislation. The TARGET2 Guideline contains the main legal elements of TARGET2, including governance arrangements and audit rules, as well as transitory provisions on the migration from TARGET to TARGET2. The Guideline was published in the Official Journal of the European Union in September 2007 and is also available on the ECB’s website in all EU languages. The Guideline has a harmonized set of rules for all TARGET2 participants and allows Eurosystem NCBs to implement these rules in an identical manner, with deviations only if national laws require such. The harmonized conditions also contain relevant alternatives which will enable NCBs to customize their respective implementation in line with the requirements of national law. According to the ECB's 2007 annual report "this approach implements the decision of the Governing Council of the ECB in October 2005 to legally construct TARGET2 as a multiple system, but aiming at the highest degree of harmonization of the legal documentation used by the central banks within the constraints of their respective national legal framework” (p. 27).
The 2004 ECB assessment concluded that SPGT observed this principle. According to the 2008 report by the BdP, "the operating rules of the SPGT were laid down in the relevant Regulation approved by the Board of Directors of the BdP and contractually accepted by the system participants. The SPGT Regulation stipulated the broad lines of the system and the relations and responsibilities of the intervening parties" (p. 14). Other important documents pertinent to understanding the rules of the SPGT system were the Procedures Manual, which provides the participants with the detailed and practical procedures to be followed in order to ensure that the system functions smoothly, and the System Manual, which provides an overview of the main operational features of the SPGT and a complete description of its components.
According to the 2004 ECB assessment SPGT observed this principle. However, the system was replaced by TARGET2 in February 2008 and as of October 2008 there is no published assessment of TARGET2 against the CPSIPS. As noted in a 2006 IMF report, the risk management procedures of the Portuguese payment systems are "robust" (p. 23).
According to the 2004 ECB assessment SPGT observed this principle. However, the system was replaced by TARGET2 in February 2008 and as of October 2008 there is no published assessment of TARGET2 against the CPSIPS. The 2008 report by the BdP noted that "the operations and transfers [in the SPGT] were considered final from the moment they wee entered in the receiving settlement account" (p. 18).
Since the SPGT was a RTGS system this principle was not applicable to it as noted in the 2004 ECB report. Similarly, TARGET2 being a RTGS system, this principle is not applicable to it either.
The 2004 ECB assessment concluded that SPGT observed this principle. However, there is little information regarding TARGET2's compliance with this principle. According to the 2007 ECB report on Euro Area Countries, “any euro payment which participants wish to process in real time and in central bank money can be executed in TARGET2” (p. 38).
According to the 2004 ECB assessment, SPGT broadly observed this principle. Further, the 2006 report by the IMF noted that "the infrastructure for payments [in Portugal] ensures a high degree of security and operational reliability" (p. 23). However, as noted earlier, in February 2008, SPGT ceased operations and was replaced by TARGET2. Although there is no comprehensive assessment publicly available of TARGET2 against the CPSS requirements for this principle, a 2007 report by the ECB titled “Fourth Progress Report on TARGET2” indicates that “a concept called ’Measures to ensure the security and operational reliability of TARGET2 participants’ has been developed. By implementing this concept, the Eurosystem, in its capacity as TARGET2 system operator, will meet CP [Core Principle] VII in respect of the security and operational reliability of TARGET2 participants” (p. 9). Per the 2007 ECB TARGET2 – Annex 2 report, TARGET2 has set contingency arrangements for failures in the system due to central bank(s)’ failure, proprietary home account (PHA) failure, an ancillary system failure, a bank failure, and the failure of the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT). Further, the 2007 ECB report on Euro Area Countries notes that “TARGET2 will offer the highest possible level of reliability and resilience, as well as sophisticated business contingency arrangements commensurate with the systemic importance of the TARGET2 infrastructure” (p. 37).
According to the 2004 ECB assessment, SPGT broadly observed this principle. Further, the 2006 report by the IMF noted that "the infrastructure for payments [in Portugal] ensures a high degree of security and operational reliability" (p. 23). With regards to the new system, TARGET2, there is no assessment publicly available of this system against the CPSS requirements for this principle.
The 2004 ECB assessment concluded that SPGT observed this principle. As for TARGET2, a 2006 report by the Bundesbank mentions that “TARGET2 provides open and competitively neutral access to large-value payments in euro. In principle, credit institutions will be free to choose between direct or indirect participation” (p. 4).
The 2004 ECB assessment concluded that SPGT observed this principle. There is insufficient information publicly available as to TARGET2's compliance with this principle.
As stated in the 2007 ECB TARGET2 – Annex 2 report, despite the transition to TARGET2, member countries’ national central banks still have supervisory authority and national legislation remains significant. According to the 2006 IMF report, "supervision of payments and settlement systems in Portugal is professional and active, comparing very well with international standards" (p. 1). The BdP oversees payment systems in Portugal pursuant to the Organic Law of the Bank of Portugal. Article 14 of Organic Law states that "it shall be incumbent on the Bank of Portugal to regulate, oversee and promote the smooth operation of payment systems, namely within the scope of its participation in the European System of Central Banks (ESCB)." In addition to the Organic Law, Section 1 of Article 117-A of the Legal Framework of Credit Institutions and Financial Companies, approved by Decree-Law No. 298 of 1992, states that “Banco the Portugal may subject to its supervision the entities that have as their purpose to carry on, or that actually carry on, activities specially relevant for the operation of the payment system, specifying the rules and duties applicable to them, from among those envisaged in this Decree-Law for financial companies."
According to the 2006 IMF report, "supervision of payments and settlement systems in Portugal is professional and active, comparing very well with international standards" (p. 1). The 2008 report by the BdP states that its "oversight function is performed by means of monitoring payment systems, assessing their compliance with the Core Principles for the Systemically Important Payment Systems, issuing regulations, exercising moral suasion and providing settlement services for banks or payment and clearing systems, as well as by playing a catalyst role in developing these systems and promoting coordination among the relevant parties through the Interbank Co-ordinating Commission for Payment Systems (CISP)" (p. 6).
According to the 2006 IMF report, "supervision of payments and settlement systems in Portugal is professional and active, comparing very well with international standards" (p. 1). The 2008 report by the BdP states that its "oversight function is performed by means of monitoring payment systems, assessing their compliance with the Core Principles for the Systemically Important Payment Systems, issuing regulations, exercising moral suasion and providing settlement services for banks or payment and clearing systems, as well as by playing a catalyst role in developing these systems and promoting coordination among the relevant parties through the Interbank Co-ordinating Commission for Payment Systems (CISP)" (p. 6).
According to the 2008 report by the BdP, "it is involved in co-operation at both a general and an interbank level" (p. 8). The BdP actively cooperates with the Securities Market Commission (CMVM), and the Insurance Supervisory Authority. In addition, the BdP cooperates with the deposit guarantee fund, the agricultural guarantee fund, and the investors’ compensation fund. For purposes of interagency cooperation the National Council of Financial Supervisors was established. Furthermore, in 1997 the CISP was set up. As reported by the 2008 BdP report, the CISP's objectives are: "to coordinate the activities of interbank working groups, to define strategies for the development of retail payment systems, to promote interbank cooperation on new products, and to regulate and standardize payment systems. On the international cooperation front, the 2007 ECB report on Euro Area countries states that “in order to institutionalize cooperation and the exchange of information regarding large-value payment systems in the EU, banking supervisors and payment system overseers from all EU Member States concluded a memorandum of understanding, which came into force on 1 January 2001” (p. 106). Despite the above information, none of the sources cited directly addresses Portugal's compliance with this principle. |
Jump to other standards Sources of Assessment Bank of Portugal, Payment Systems Department, "Payment Systems in Portugal," January 2008. Available from Bank of Portugal website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (BdP 2008) European Central Bank, “TARGET 2 User Requirements Prepared by the TARGET Working Group,” October 2002. Available from European Central Bank website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (ECB 2002) European Central Bank, “Assessment of Euro Large-Value Payment Systems Against the Core Principles,” Frankfurt, Germany: ECB, May 2004. Available from European Central Bank website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (ECB 2004) European Central Bank, "Assessment of Euro Retail Payment Systems against the Applicable Core Principles," Frankfurt, Germany: ECB, August 2005. Available from European Central Bank website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (ECB 2005) European Central Bank, “Fourth Progress Report on TARGET2,” June 2007. Available from European Central Bank website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (ECB 2007a) European Central Bank, “Payment and Securities Settlement Systems in the European Union: Euro Area Countries,” Volume 1, Frankfurt, Germany: ECB, August 2007. Available from European Central Bank website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (ECB 2007b) European Central Bank, “Fifth Progress Report on TARGET2 – Annex 1: Information Guide for TARGET2 Users,” October 2007. Available from European Central Bank website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (ECB 2007c) European Central Bank, "TARGET Annual Report: 2007," Frankfurt, Germany: ECB, April 2008. Available from European Central Bank website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (ECB 2008a) European Central Bank, "Payment Systems and Market Infrastructure Oversight Report 2007," Frankfurt, Germany: ECB, July 2008. Available from European Central Bank website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (ECB 2008b) International Monetary Fund, "Portugal: Financial System Stability Assessment including Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes on the following topics: Banking Supervision, Securities Regulation, and Insurance Regulation," Country Report No. 06/378, Washington, D.C.: IMF, October 24, 2006. Available from International Monetary Fund website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (IMF 2006) Relevant Organizations Bank of Portugal - Banco de Portugal (BdP) European Central Bank (ECB) Interbank Co-ordinating Commission for Payment Systems - Comissăo Interbancária para os Sistemas de Pagamentos (CISP) TARGET2 Project Relevant Legislation/Regulation Organic Law of the Bank of Portugal No. 5, 1998 - Lei Orgânica do Banco de Portugal No. 5, 1998 (with amendments through 2007) Legal Framework of Credit Institutions and Financial Companies No. 298, 1992 (Portuguese version has amendments through 2008; English translation includes amendments through 2003) Maastricht Treaty – Treaty on European Union, 1992 Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank No. C 191/68, 1992 European Union Directive on Settlement Finality in Payment and Securities Settlement Systems No. 98/26/EC, 1998 European Union Directive on Cross-Border Credit Transfers No. 97/5/EC, 1997 Guide for the Assessment against the Business Continuity Oversight Expectations for SIPS, 2007 Guideline of the ECB on a Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system (TARGET2) No. ECB/2007/2, 2007 Decision of the ECB Concerning the Terms and Conditions of TARGET2-ECB No. ECB/2007/7, 2007 Guideline of the ECB on a Trans-European Automated Real-Time Gross Settlement Express Transfer System (TARGET) No. ECB/2005/16, 2005 ECB Guide for the Assessment against the Business Continuity Oversight Expectations for SIPS, 2007 ECB's Terms of Reference for the Oversight Assessment of Euro Systemically and Prominently Important Payment Systems against the Core Principles, 2007 European Union Directives on Payment Services Supplementary Sources Bank of Portugal, "Report on Payment and Interbank Settlement Systems – 2006," Lisbon, Portugal: BdP, 2007. Available from Bank of Portugal website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (BdP 2007) Bundesbank, “TARGET2: A Single Europe for Individual Payments as Well,” July 2006. Available from Deutsche Bundesbank website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (Bundesbank 2006) European Central Bank, "The Evolution of Large-Value Payment Systems in the Euro Area," Frankfurt. ECB, August 2006. Available from European Central Bank website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (ECB 2006) European Central Bank, “Fifth Progress Report on TARGET2, Annex 2: User Information Guide to TARGET2 Pricing,” October 2007. Available from European Central Bank website. Accessed on November 1, 2008. (ECB 2007d) |